The goal of our Society for Conservation Biology (SCB) Europe Section Blog is to share stories and relevant information about activities going on within our section and more broadly in the conservation community. Stories and articles shared on our blog should not be taken as an official position or statement of SCB or SCB Europe Section. Thank you for reading!
Showing posts with label Eastern Europe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Eastern Europe. Show all posts

Friday, 2 August 2013

”IPBES should increase the political feasibility of biodiversity conservation” – How can Eastern Europe contribute? East European Regional Consultation on IPBES, Hungary 31 July – 2 Aug


With its first plenary meeting held in January 2013 in Bonn, Germany, the Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) has moved into its operational phase. Right now, the newly elected Bureau and Multidisciplinary Expert Panel (MEP) are preparing key documents for the future: The draft work programme (2014-2018) and the draft of a Stakeholder Engagement Strategy. In summer 2013, draft documents will be released for public consultation, and governments and stakeholders of IPBES, like regional knowledge networks, are asked to provide their input.

Hungary is hosting now the IPBES East European Offical Stakeholder Meeting for the coming 2 days. Two members of the MEP and two members of the IPBES Bureau are present in the consultation, during which experts and stakeholders from Eastern-European countries are compiling a list of comments, suggestions and additional contribution to be channeled into the draft Work Programme 2014-2018 and the stakeholder engagement strategy. These documents will be finalized and approved by the next IPBES plenary at the end of this year (December 2013) in Antalya. It is therefore essential to raise and articulate Eastern-European issues and perspectives in order to include them in the IPBES process.

The consultation started with an open meeting at the Hungarian Ministry of Rural Development attended by the participants. As György Pataki, vice-chair of the Multidisciplinary Panel pointed out, this meeting should serve as an opportunity to learn from invited stakeholders, to feed their aspects and suggestions into the IPBES  process. Eastern-European countries have not been too active so far, they need to become more dedicated and articulated in the consultation process. György also mentioned the problem of financing – due to UN regulations, many of the MEP members have to cover their own budget related to IPBES activities, and lack of governmental support  seriously challenges their consistent participation.

Jerry Harrison, Interim Secretariat of IPBES is talking
about the ongoing process 
Jerry Harrison (UK), representative of the IPBES Interim Secretariat reported on the IPBES build-up progress and the timeline of the coming events. He highlighted the fact that actual implementation of the IPBES will start after the Antalya Plenary with five documents being out now for international review. The actual implementation is also the subject of current discussions.

András Báldi (HU) talked about the ecosystem sevice concept and the need to put a price tag on nature as the main reason behind forming IPBES. Adem Bilgin from Turkey presented the work of the study group on conceptualization of value in IPBES as the core concept.

Will IPBES really help in addressing biodiversity crisis? – asked one concerned NGO participant. As Adem Bilgin replied, the responses that IPBES will give, depend on the questions the governmenst are asking. IPBES should go well beyond being a scientific body, it has to be an interface between science and policy. As Bilgin stated "IPBES should increase the political feasibility of biodiversity conservation” stressing the importance of policy implications.

After the closing remarks, workshop participants headed towards Lake Balaton to continue the consultation.

Tuesday, 19 March 2013

Bird crime - Worshop on the illegal raptor bird killing in Hungary


By Anikó Kovács, PhD, Chair of the SCB Hungarian Chapter

Photo by P. Szenczi 
The SCB Hungarian Chapter together with the Hungarian Society of Biology, the Hungarian Ornithological and Nature Conservation Association and the Bükki National Park Directorate organised the 8th Hungarian Conference of Conservation Biology (HCCB). The actual international workshop of the HCCB series was hold in Felsőtárkány, Hungary, 22th February with the contribution of participants from seven European countries: Hungary, Slovakia, Austria, Czech Republic, Serbia, Romania and Scotland – United Kingdom.

The workshop focused on the illegal raptor bird killing in the Carpathian Basin, and it was followed by the 8th annual meeting of raptor bird protection organised by the Hungarian Ornithological and Nature Conservation Association and the Hungarian Raptor Bird Protection Council, on 23th February. The two-day long event was visited by 104 participants.

Photo by P. Szenczi
The workshop aimed to discuss the main problems and potential solutions of raptor bird protection, and to provide platform for exchange experiences on the more and more often occurring illegal raptor bird killing events in the related Central-European countries. The participants discussed the Action Plan against raptor bird poisoning that will hopefully support more effective conservation of the species in the future. The experts presented their experiences on crime against raptor birds in their countries. According to their data, in the last decades the number of illegally killed eagles was 40 in Austria, 24 in the Czech Republic, 22 in Slovakia, 18 in Serbia and 2 in Romania, while the Hungarian data were far beyond these values. Since 2000 176 eagles have been poisoned, shut or killed by nest destroy in Hungary. This far too high value still continued to increase, and further killings occurred just in few days after the workshop.

Photo by P. Szenczi
Fortunately there are people and organisations, who are committed to protect these special and wonderful bird species. The main sponsor of the workshop, the Helicon LIFE+ program coordinated by the Hungarian Ornithological and Nature Conservation Association, started in 2012 aims to decrease the direct adverse effects of persecution incidents on the Hungarian imperial eagle (Aquila heliaca) population, increase the chance of detecting illegal activities and imposing precedent judgments in the association with among others the National Bureau of Investigation, Hunter's National Chamber, the Ministry of Rural Develoment, the Hortobágy National Park Directorate (NPD), the Bükki NPD and the Kőrös-Maros NPD.

Thursday, 21 February 2013

Common pastures in Transylvania (Romania) – or maybe not so common anymore?


Pasture in Southern Transylvania, Romania

Over the past two years, I have talked to many livestock owners (many consider themselves more ‘householders’ – gospodari in Romanian – than farmers), as well as people from public administration and nature conservation, about the use of common grazing land in Southern Transylvania. This type of land use stretches back over centuries (the area was historically inhabited by the Transylvanian Saxons, about which previous posts in this blog have been written), and in each village institutions have built up to govern common grazing. A (very) rough estimate suggests that currently, at least half of permanent pasture in Romania is communally owned and used, and in the Târnava Mare region where I work private ownership of grazing land is practically unknown. At least, that is what appears to be the case at first glance.

Of course the story is complicated by many factors, but a major influence on the recent use patterns of common land has been the introduction of EU Common Agricultural Policy subsidies per hectare in 2007. Instead of the previous situation of all villagers sending their animals to the pasture in the village herd, people now have an incentive (subsidy money) to rent as large an area of communal pasture from the local authorities as they can, for as long as they can. Although the stipulations attached to the EU subsidies have in many cases meant that management of the pasture has improved from a biodiversity point of view relative to 10 or 15 years ago, quasi-private use of certain areas appears to be leading to overgrazing in some parts, and abandonment in others.  From a social point of view, competition for the money – and thus corruption – mean that under this system it is again the small farmers who lose out. Not owning enough animals themselves to rent pasture, and rarely organized enough to fight for the subsidies for the land that they graze, the playing field has been tipped against them.

Whilst the Enclosures forcibly and relatively rapidly privatized common land in Western Europe in the 17th and 18th centuries, it seems like market forces and subsidies are doing the same in Eastern Europe by stealth. Whether this is a positive or negative development for rural areas in Romania is debatable: in my opinion it will largely depend on how local farmers – and gospodari – self-organise and cooperate in the future to use their common pastures.

Reference

SUTCLIFFE, L., PAULINI, I., JONES, G., MARGGRAF, R., PAGE, N.. Pastoral commons use in Romania and the role of the Common Agricultural Policy. International Journal of the Commons http://www.thecommonsjournal.org/index.php/ijc/article/view/367/313 (OPEN ACCESS)

Laura Sutcliffe: Institute for Plant Sciences, University of Göttingen, Germany sutcliffe.laura@gmail.com

Monday, 23 July 2012

Wood-pastures from Southern Transylvania, Romania


Although wood-pastures are cultural and natural landscape elements of international importance, virtually nothing is known about their status and distribution in Eastern Europe in the wider conservation community
Figure 1. Ancient wood-pasture
in 
Southern Transylvania
.
Although Romania is potentially rich in wood-pastures, only those from Southern (Saxon) Transylvania benefited of habitat surveys. Wood-pastures from Southern Transylvania were formed by the Saxon ethnic group through rearing the forests and grazing them with pigs, cattle, sheep and from the 18th century, buffalo. Each Saxon village had historically at least one wood-pasture in its vicinity. Wood-pastures from Southern Transylvania are dominated by oak (Quercus robur, Q. petraea), and occasionally by beech (Fagus sylvatica) and hornbeam (Carpinus betulus).
Wood-pastures from Southern Transylvania are excellent systems for those interested in historical ecology, the history of nature resource governance, the dynamic of traditional social-ecological systems, and for ecologists (Akeroyd 2003, Hartel and Moga 2010).

The Saxon area of Transylvania has a long history of forest grazing. Saxons were allowed to manage their forests by the very beginning of their arrival in Transylvania, by a document commonly referred as ‘Andreanum’ (The Golden Charter of Transylvanian Saxons, 1224). Forest management at those times included also grazing in forests. A document originating in the 16th century showed that Transylvanian Saxons asked István Báthory (the Prince of Transylvania and the King of Poland, the Grand Duke of Lithuania) to empower local authorities to control grazing with sheep and pigs in the oak forests in their territory (Tescula and Gota 2007, Hartel and Moga 2010).
In bigger towns like Sighisoara and Medias, wood-pastures were also increasingly used for cultural events from the end of the 19th century.

Figure 2. Cultural event on the Breite wood-pasture: Skopationsfest,
sometime in the early 20th century
 (source of the picture: 
http://www.rezervatia-breite.ro/origine-si-istorie).
The cultural-traditional relationships between people and wood-pastures sharply changed in the 20th century after the establishment of the communist regime. Many big, old trees were cut in this period. Old Saxons from Sighisoara relate that the trees from the Breite wood-pasture were so large that cutting them was impossible: explosives were used to remove then, and they were pulled out with heavy machinery.
Changes didn’t stop with the collapse of the communism in 1989. From an ethnic-social perspective, a significant change was the massive exodus of Saxons from Transylvania. With the collapse of the traditional Saxon institutions, the traditional links between wood-pastures and their forming and maintaining culture were broken. The grazing regime also changed in the Saxon area of Transylvania: a massive reduction occurred in the number of cows along with an almost complete disappearance of buffalos, due to social and institutional changes. This reduction in grazing triggered the development of shrubs and the forest regeneration in wood-pastures. Many large oaks were overgrown and killed by regenerating hornbeam.

Figure 3. Hornbeam development in an
 ancient wood-pasture where grazing was stopped.
Since 2007 European Union agri-environment payments have been available, and farmers are using this opportunity. They clean the shrubs from wood-pastures and start to use them again. Evidence of shrub clearance was noticed in 10 out of 42 wood-pastures inventoried in 2012. Because financial incentives continue to favour sheep grazing, the number of sheep has dramatically increased in these landscapes in recent years. The frequency of uncontrolled pasture burning is also showing an increasing tendency. Many people believe that the agri-environment payment system indirectly contributes to the increase of pasture burning, although such burning is illegal. Pasture burnings appear to contribute to the dramatic decline of old, veteran trees. In 2012, more than 40 veteran trees (with trunk circumference of more than 4 meters) were burned in this way, while most of the 155 oaks with more than 4.7 meter trunk circumference inventoried in 2009 and 2010 bear the signs of burning in the past. Old, dying veteran trees are more likely to be injured by people than the young trees. People often cut ancient trees to use them as firewood in winter, while other trees are burned deliberately. A number of old trees collapse due to natural causes (such as lightening and drought). The sharp degradation and disappearance of ancient trees requires the urgent implementation of conservation measures designed to protect them.

Figure 4. One of the many ancient trees burned 
in a wood-pasture near Sighisoara (spring, 2012). 
The fire was extinguished by a fireman.

Even with the above dramatic picture about the Transylvanian wood-pastures, we have reasons to believe that the next decades will catch the Saxon region of Transylvania with wood-pastures and ancient trees – and their degradation will be stopped. First, evidence about the distribution, status and ecological value of wood-pastures is increasing. Second, nature conservation, ecological education and cultural tourism initiatives are increasing in the region – ancient wood-pastures can be an important component of these initiatives. In this respect successful initiatives were the ‘Find the oldest tree’ and the ‘Oak day’ of the Mihai Eminescu Trust with tens of schools involved and wide media coverage. One of us (TH) give lectures in 17 schools for local communities about the ecological and cultural value of the scattered and ancient trees in 2012. Third, there are many organizations interested in nature and cultural heritage conservation. Fourth, the international visibility of the wood-pastures and the region as a whole is increasing. The region tends to be attractive not only to high profile research teams from Western Europe but also to non-academics interested in nature. In combination, these various activities appear to be creating fertile ground for establishing new links between wood-pastures and people – to the benefit of both.

Figure 5. The biggest known living oak from
Southern Transylvania (in the village Mercheasa)
and the kids who find it:
 Dana Pelei and Sebastian Pelei (
General School, Rupea)
– the winners of the competition ‘Find the oldest tree’.
The oak have 930 cm circumference.
References
Akeroyd J. 2003. A Transylvanian wood-pasture. Plant Talk 34: 34-37.
Hartel T., Moga C.I. 2010. Good practice management of wood-pasture habitats. Mihai Eminescu Trust. (in Romanian)
Tescula N., Gota A. 2007. The history of the Breite wood-pasture. In: The management plan of the Breite wood-pasture reserve. (in Romanian)

Authors
Tibor Hartel – Mihai Eminescu Trust, Sighisoara, Romania; Leuphana University, Lüneburg, Germany
 Ine Doresteijn - Leuphana University, Lüneburg, Germany. E-mail: ine.dorresteijn@gmail.com
Anne-Catherine Klein - 7 rue du trèfle Wintzenheim France. E-mail: 4iklein@gmail.com
Cosmin Ioan Moga – Ecotransilvania Association, Sighisoara, Romania. E-mail: cosmin.moga@gmail.com  
Árpád Szapanyos – Ecotransilvania Association, Sighisoara, Romania. E-mail: picos_a@yahoo.com
Marlene Röllig – Leuphana University, Lüneburg, Germany. E-mail: roellig@uni.leuphana.de
Kinga Öllerer – Institute of Biology, Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania. E-mail: kinga.ollerer@gmail.com
Joern Fischer – Leuphana University, Lüneburg, Germany. E-mail: joern.fischer@uni.leuphana.de