The influence of old and active woodland grazing by domestic livestock
in wood pastures is an important element of the traditional landscape of the Carpathian Basin . Following several
landscape-history studies, this fact became recently known among Hungarian
ecologists. One of the reasons why „the
grazing in wood by livestock” has got in the focus of researchers in this
area is that in Hungary nearly all the wood pastures are abandoned or becoming
abandoned, leading to major traditional knowledge and biodiversity loss without
having just a few information about this habitat type. Our aim to get
understand and discover the history and methods of
woodpasturing and the effect of woodpasturing to the biodiversity by
interdisciplinary methods (landscape history, vegetation, zoology and
traditional ecological knowledge research). We work in different regions of
Hungary and in Szeklerland in Transylvania in Romania, where traditional land
use is still maintained at several places, and therefore these areas could have
major importance in understanding natural and cultural functions of wood-pastures.
A typical wood-pasture between 19-21th
century. The picture was took by Ferenc
Sándor
in 1960-1970.*
|
Wood-pasture is a
habitat type which does not only depend on the natural environment, but on
human-related activities, too. Regulations, economy, livestock type all affect
this habitat and most importantly the man himself, who works there day after
day. The change of these factors identifies the concept, the definition and the
managment of the wood-pastures. After the Enlightenment in Hungary the main
changes were in the 18-19th
century: the forest- and pastureland seperation; in the first half of 20th century: forestry law and the industralization,
in the second half of 20th
century: the socialization and after the privatization.
Cserépfalu wood-pasture managed by Bükk National Park, grazed by Hungarian grey cattle. |
And now we are in
the beginning of the 21th century… and most of the Hungarian
wood-pastures from 5500 ha were abandoned. These were mapped by Hungarian
Vegetation Survey (Bölöni et al. 2008). Today wood-pastures managed by national
parks (rangers), a few enthaustic farmers and herders.
To understand
recent situation of the Hungarian wood-pastures we carried out open and
semi-structured interviews with herders-farmers and rangers (working in nature
conservation) in Hungary, together with participant observation. Herders'
and rangers' gave diverse and sometimes very
different definitions and answers, in spite of the fact that the fundamental
aim is the long-distance maintenance of the pasture for everybody.
Year by year less and less
traditonaly herder works on wood-pastures. He is one of them, who was born in a herder family and still work. |
But we can
understand much more easily if we look the different values attributed by rangers
and herders. The most important value of a wood-pasture for rangers is related
to the landscape and biodiversity, and for herders to pasturing and feeding the
livestock. For me one of the most interesting data was, thet the herders do not
entitle an area as a wood pasture, what professional conservation managers
would call a wood pasture, they simply call it: pasture. For the herders, coming
from traditional herder families „the trees on the pastureland” is not a
separate habitat. „The trees on the pastureland” is natural, continuous and
essential. They see and use the landscape as a whole system. In practice of the traditional pasturing
system this means the animals graze all over the boundary of the village (with
the herder considering the forcoming season and weather). At the same time the
usage of a wood-pasture means a micro-scale view too (for example: conscious
tree and shrub selection).
In order to improve the conservation of wood-pastures it is
essential to view this habitat type through the managers eyes, and the best we
can do is joining them to pasture at least for one day…
Anna Varga
varga.anna@gmail.com
Pécs, Ifjúság útja 6., H-7624, Hungary ,
Literarture
Bölöni, J., Molnár,
Zs., Biró, M. & Horváth, F. (2008): Distribution of the (semi-) natural
habitats in Hungary II. Woodlands and shrublands. Acta Botanica Hungarica 50 (Suppl.), pp.107–148
*(To the first picture) After
forest and pastureland seperation (1862)
the regular grazing and clearing of the area is controlled by the community of
the farmers of Olaszfalu and the area
called “Olaszfalui Volt Úrbéres Gazdák Legelője”. In the beginning of the
1950s, there was regular grazing and cleaning in the area, and there was 10%
woodland (Fagus sylvatica, Quecus cerris, Pyrus pyraster, Carpinus betulus,
Acer campestre). Since the establishment
of the soviet co-operative in the 1960s, the number of animals started to
decrease, consequently the regular maintenance
and clearing of the pasture ceased. In the last few years the former pasture
was utilized as a hunting ground. In
2007 the territory has been divided into parcels. With the filling up of
parkland stands today 52% of the area consists of closed woodland. 17% of the
woodland is older than 50 years, 38% is between 30 and 40, while 45% is between
10 and 20 years.
8 comments:
Hello Barbara
What an interesting article. How could we do this realistically? We have a 2500 sq metre woodland garden and have been wondering about keeping some sheep. We are in rural France and think it could be great to keep some animals. I would be happy to find out how things happen here in France and maybe write a blog post for your blog
Best regards
Simon
Hi Barbara,
Growing trees in central New England, USA involves working with lands that were treated as you observed as much as 150 years ago. All openings are gone and the "wolf" trees that you show are frequently also gone, but their effect still is apparent.
One option for ecological preservation of this type of open space against both encroachment by development and climate change is to try to enhance the productivity of the site for trees and to retain increased amounts of carbon as soil applied charcoal which is chemically recalcitrant (~inert at normal soil temperatures).
The question you have not addressed is how does one do this in a money centered economy when the money values do not include the values that come from a particular use? The current Euro crisis is precisely this issue as well since the source of all value has been transferred to private banks rather than the common good of the region that is tapped in traditional ways.
The problem that all developed countries face is that the external banks are "miners" of local value and when the value is gone they go someplace else and do the same thing.
Good luck with trying to maintain these areas.
Alan Page
Simon: that is a great idea - I am sure that traditional knowledge on e.g. pasturing can be still found in the European landscape. Anna Varga is the author of this post, who is doing actually the research on these very interesting habitats - you can find her email in the post. Looking forward to hear from you about your experiences!
Hi Alan
Thank you very much for your comment! (It is important to note that the author of this post was Anna Varga - see her contact in the post.)
What you mention is actually the precise challenge many of the traditional landscapes in Europe is facing. Our recent post on a study in Conservation Letters clearly addresses this problem. Incentives for land-use practices should support the maintainance of traditional landscapes - but in many cases, the productivity of that particular landscape is the most important aspect takent into consideration.
Hi Barbara,
The base of the transformation that we are all dealing with in one way or another is the inappropriate expectation that personal human returns from activity are somehow different from the returns (value added in financial terms)that are found in the older systems that your group is studying.
It is imperative that those who understand the growth curves of natural systems find a way to speak out about the inherent differences we find between the unrestrained compound interest calculations [ fv=pv x (1+i)*n ] and the normal heavily constrained natural growth curves found in all biological systems.
Every organism has a growth path that is constrained unless it somehow escapes the normal constraints and takes on the cancerous ability to multiply at will. Invasive plant colonizations are examples of a sector of biology that has escaped the constraint of local pathogens and predators.
Today the differences between industrial agriculture and agroforestry must be described as a financial cancer with examples that anyone who cares to can understand.
The promise of unrestrained compound interest is that any investor can achieve an infinite return just by holding a savings account long enough to have it go through more than ~twenty doublings.
The truth of the matter is that in a finite world if anyone (or any group) has an infinite amount of anything then everyone else has nothing. This is both unfair, impossible and very bad policy. Yet this is the basis for all bank transactions!
The connections may seem tenuous but I guarantee that when short term returns are more important than the long term stability of a well constrained natural population you will end up with a cancerous condition which will end itself with the death of the host. We need to understand that the life support systems of our planet are now the "host" that our cancerous financial system is attacking for profit.
We must find a way to remove the profit from these irresponsible actions. The only recourse that I have found is to expose the lie that is the promise offered in the compound interest formula [ fv=pv x (1+i)*n ] and demand that a reasonable appropriately constrained system for calculations of returns be required for all official / legal dealings.
Your work to describe how these old systems work and the values that come from them is an important part of understanding where the reality stops and the lie of unrestrained growth takes off. The removal of high taxation rates on excessive personal income sought by global investors is one way that the financial community has used to escape these constraints. Replacement of appropriate progressive taxation is one way to resolve this issue , but it is not the only one and the discussion of how personal income relates to the support given by all sectors of life support [mothers, family, community, local ecology / geology / climate,,,] appears to be the place to start. These support systems are “infrastructure” and have a different time horizon than most other normal human activities and are worthy of much different treatment by the sovereign power.
Dear Simon
Thank you very much for your comment! I am sorry for my late answer, nowadays I do not have a proper internet connection.
In May I visited wood pastures in Languedoc-Roussillon region of France. So I am sure you can find some practical and living examples in France!
Just in case I send you two interesting French webpage address:
http://www.agroforesterie.fr/
http://www.agroof.net/
Best wishes,
Anna Varga
Post a Comment